Court allows DPP to withdraw Sh73.5m Obado case after Sh235m repayment
Crime and Justice
By
Nancy Gitonga
| May 15, 2026
Former Migori Governor Okoth Obado, his four children and several associates have walked free after the Milimani Anti-Corruption Court allowed the Director of Public Prosecution's bid to withdraw the Sh73.5 million graft case against them following an out-of-court settlement.
In a detailed ruling delivered on Friday, Magistrate Celesa Okore ruled that the DPP did not abuse his powers in brokering the deal, and adopted the plea bargain agreement as a judgment of the court.
“The court is satisfied that the plea agreement has met the substantive legal test and has a sound legal basis upon which it can be adopted,” ruled Okore.
"This court adopted the pre-agreement as a judgment of this court. It follows that all the charges are being withdrawn against all the accused persons."
The magistrate noted that none of the charges facing the accused persons fell under offences excluded from plea bargaining under Section 137 of the Criminal Procedure Code, such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, or offences under the Sexual Offences Act.
READ MORE
Farmers risk losing half their harvest, agency warns
How high-stakes home ownership dreams are shattered by city cartels
Afreximbank bets on $10bn crisis fund, gold bank to bolster African sovereignty
Africa-France summit ends with push to overhaul key trade rules
Ecobank, AGRA partner to boost agricultural financing
Kenya's infrastructure push drives demand for heavy machinery
Kenya targets North African startups in regional innovation push
French firms target Kenya housing sector after Africa summit
Lamu rising digital economy through youth skills training
Construction sector adjusts to clinker levy on industry rebound
Central to the court’s decision was the Sh235 million civil forfeiture settlement reached between the accused persons and the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), alongside the surrender of two motor vehicles.
The court found that the agreement constituted a valid and lawful resolution mechanism.
“The civil forfeiture achieved the same objective that would have been realized through criminal forfeiture,” the magistrate observed, adding that the settlement was a key factor in determining the pathway taken by the prosecution.
More to follow